|
Saving
the Ashes-a ‘part-time’ job! - By guest writer Mani Thangadurai
From
what has been seen (or not!) in Australia’s
two-day match against Essex, England probably won't
have much to worry about the probable Australian attack
for the Oval. Adam Gilchrist's side were without Shane
Warne and Glenn McGrath, and the visibly toothless
attack was pummelled for over 500 runs in Essex’s
first innings, with only Mike Kasprowicz and Shaun
Tait picking up wickets among the party. The biggest
piece of news was that leg-spinner Stuart MacGill's
24 wicketless overs went for 128 runs at a rate of
5.33. Now there was talk of him quite possibly coming
into the side for the final Test at the Oval in order
to give Ricky Ponting another spinning option and
possibly to exploit England's shakiness against deliveries
from the back of the hand. Well, if any of the English
batsmen had been watching the course of events today,
they might just be licking their lips at that prospect!
To be fair, MacGill is a good bowler,
but he's no Shane Warne. The New South Welshman does
have a pretty good record in Test Cricket, including
splendid statistics against England, but as a bowler
he probably doesn't quite have the same variety or
drift and fizz in his bowling that Warne possesses,
and it was always going to be difficult for him to
perform having just come back into competitive cricket.
The fact that former Australian captain and selector
Allan Border once said that Warne would get straight
back into the team after one of his suspensions despite
MacGill's form sums it up.
Of course, on the question of whether
MacGill would or should be drafted in, I would probably
call it a sign of desperation in Australia's ranks,
and in particular the all-important balance of the
side would be greatly affected. Not much is known
about the fitness of McGrath, and certainly his condition
and availability for the Test will be crucial to Australia's
hopes of retaining the Ashes.
The most likely scenario is that if
McGrath is fit, he will definitely get back into the
side ahead of Kasprowicz, leaving Tait and MacGill
to fight over the final spot. And on that note, it
might not make any sense at all to drop the youngster,
who made a good impression on his debut, especially
since despite being expensive he was able to cause
a bit of discomfort for the batsmen. Both Tait and
MacGill are also, like McGrath, genuine rabbits, so
the question of including both of them and lengthening
the tail is out.
This series has certainly been notable
for the unexpectedly below-average displays by some
of the Australian bowlers, with the exceptions of
Warne, McGrath and Lee. Jason Gillespie has been completely
out of sorts, Kasprowicz has been a disappointment,
and the amount of extras conceded so far was enough
to leave John Buchanan hopping mad. Such has been
the bowlers' profligacy that England were able to
post scores of over 400 in three successive tests,
which certainly made a difference in the light of
this contest.
Often in situations like this, desperation
brings about necessity, and here, necessity could
prove to be the breeder of inspiration! What do you
do when your specialists don't fire? Simple-turn to
your part-timers!
Ricky Ponting is himself only a part-time
seamer, but arguably his best performance as captain
came at Trent Bridge where he almost orchestrated
an unlikely win in the fourth innings. In the first
innings, prior to that wonderful partnership, he had
England in a bit of bother when, frustrated at the
lack of a breakthrough, decided, "If I want a
wicket, I might as well try my luck!" And he
then proceeded to bowl 6 overs of medium-quickish
pace, getting a few to swing quite prodigiously, and
was rewarded with the wicket of his English counterpart
Michael Vaughan, who until then was looking set for
a huge score. Ponting's figures were simply beautiful:
6 overs, 2 maidens, 1 for 9, but rather surprisingly
he didn't bring himself on afterwards. Unlike his
main seamers, he was able to cause more than a few
problems for the batsmen that day, kept it simple,
and was able to reap some reward of sorts!
Then comes the question of another
spinner to possibly lend a bit of support to Shane
Warne. Michael Clarke could have been quite handy,
but his back problem has ensured that he has so far
refrained from bowling even a single delivery in this
Ashes. And then there's the small matter of Simon
Katich. I expect him to be in the side, given his
value to the middle order, and also has the ability
to bowl some useful left-arm chinaman. His solitary
5-wicket haul (6, in fact!) may have come against
Zimbabwe, but anyone who has seen him bowl will know
about his ability to possibly tie up an end or two.
Now as some of you may know, I'm the
last person on this earth to suggest that any part-time
bowler should be made to practice his bowling in the
nets and bowl more overs, especially since they do
have a level of unpredictability about them which
often makes captains think twice about bowling them
for longer spells.
But assuming that Australia do continue
with a three-man seam attack and a solitary spinner
in Warne in order to maintain their balance, I would
say that Ponting and Katich would certainly have an
important role to play in proceedings, especially
since they can, as we all know, provide some vital
breakthroughs. Particularly with England's shakiness
against leg-spin still being raised, it probably does
make all the more sense to try and have a two-man
attack, and if Katich does come on to bowl along with
Warne in tandem, it would certainly result in an interesting
left-right combination which might just be enough
to cause problems. And maybe Ponting himself can bring
himself on in order to rest one of his seamers. The
trick here is really to make the most of whatever
you can get under the circumstances, and it is here
that in my view, given the still clear uncertainty
of most of England's batsmen on how to try and dominate
tight bowling, these guys could just make a difference.
If Australia are serious about saving
the Ashes, then not only do they need to make some
responsible selections, but they must look within
themselves to try and find some rousing performances
and rise to the occasion. Tinkering with the bowling
attack won't be the answer. If Ponting and Katich
can step up and possibly make themselves counted with
the ball, it might add a new dimension to the Australian
attack and perhaps, just perhaps, influence the performance
of both teams on the field come the 8th of September.
The ball is now firmly in their hands, and now it's
time for them to either put up a fight, or turn off
the lights!
Ashes
2005 Main Menu | Ashes 2005 News Index |